When the arbitration filings dropped, the numbers themselves told the story. According to NHL insider Elliotte Friedman, the camp for defenseman Dylan Samberg is asking for a hefty $6 million AAV. The Winnipeg Jets, on the other hand, came in at just $2.5 million. That’s not a gap; that’s a $3.5 million chasm, and it speaks volumes about where this relationship is heading.
As someone who watches these negotiations closely, this isn’t just standard posturing. This is a high-stakes chess match where the Jets are risking one of their most valuable defensive assets. The takeaway is clear: the one-year award from arbitration would walk Samberg directly to unrestricted free agency next summer, and this massive gap in valuation makes a long-term resolution before the hearing feel incredibly distant. The clock is ticking, and the risk for Winnipeg is enormous.
Analyzing the Arbitration Ask: Is Samberg Worth Top-Pairing Money?
Let’s be clear: Samberg’s camp isn’t pulling that $6 million figure out of thin air. The 26-year-old is coming off a phenomenal season where he established himself as a legitimate top-four, and arguably top-pairing, defenseman. Despite missing time with a broken foot, he posted a career-high 20 points in 60 games.
But the traditional stats don’t even tell the full story. He led the entire team with an elite +34 rating while munching over 21 minutes of ice time per night. That’s not third-pairing usage; that’s prime-time responsibility. His camp will argue that he drives play, excels defensively, and has become indispensable to the Jets’ blue line. They are betting that an arbitrator will look at his rate stats and his impact and see a player whose value is far closer to their ask than the Jets’ offer.
The Jets’ Perspective: A Calculated Risk or a Costly Mistake?
From the Jets’ side, the $2.5 million offer is an anchor designed to pull the potential arbitration award down. They’ll point to his career total of 51 points and argue he hasn’t demonstrated elite offensive production over a long period. They’ll frame this past season as a potential outlier, not the new norm.
However, this is a dangerous game. By lowballing a player who has clearly outperformed his $1.4 million bridge deal, they risk alienating him. The most likely “meet in the middle” scenario of around $4.25 million on a one-year award might seem palatable now, but it solves nothing long-term. It just delays the inevitable and gives a core player a full year to think about testing the open market, where a team would almost certainly offer him the term and money he’s looking for. Wednesday’s hearing looms large, but the real deadline is next summer.
The post Why the Jets and Dylan Samberg Are a Staggering $3.5 Million Apart appeared first on NHL Trade Rumors.
